Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,788,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,026 compared to $74,279, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $87,255, a difference of 20.8%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $90,543, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.64%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 39.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.8%).