Japanese vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Japanese
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Japanese
Iroquois
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Japanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,963,146 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Iroquois.
Japanese vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,395 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $87,255, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,870 compared to $39,104, a difference of 2.0%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Income Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,870 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,288 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,395 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,825 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,473 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,528 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,365 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,624 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,834 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,919 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Unemployment Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Labor Participation Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Tragic 38.2% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Japanese vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Japanese | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |