Hungarian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,495,093 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.896% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 895.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $87,255, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($86,920 compared to $74,279, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($105,609 compared to $90,543, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($47,795 compared to $42,430, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.8%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.60%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.7%).