South African vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,368,459 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.392% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 392.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $39,104, a difference of 28.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $87,255, a difference of 25.8%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $74,279, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $36,408, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.5%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%).