Crow vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Crow

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Crow Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,547,179 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 95.3 Iroquois.
Crow Integration in Iroquois Communities

Crow vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $39,104, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $90,543, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,408, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $53,737, a difference of 9.1%).
Crow vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricCrowIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,729
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,605
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,681
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,707
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,434
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,266
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,012
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,337
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,257
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,234
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Crow vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 70.7%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.95%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.8%).
Crow vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricCrowIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.6%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.5%

Crow vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 210.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.1%).
Crow vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCrowIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
11.1%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
26.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Crow vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Crow vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCrowIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.8%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
75.9%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
76.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Crow vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.0%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.16, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Crow vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCrowIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.82
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Crow vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Crow vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCrowIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
6.5%

Crow vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.3%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Crow vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricCrowIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
99.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
99.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
99.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Crow vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Crow vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricCrowIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%