Luxembourger vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Iroquois

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,835,042 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 11.0 Iroquois.
Luxembourger Integration in Iroquois Communities

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.7%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $90,543, a difference of 17.3%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $39,104, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.6%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.5%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.5%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.8%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 104.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.6%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.0%).
Luxembourger vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%