Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Iroquois

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,569,245 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 61.2 Iroquois.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Iroquois Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $39,104, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $83,682, a difference of 18.8%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $90,543, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $47,380, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $36,408, a difference of 12.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
25.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
80.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.06 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
38.2%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Good
6.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%