Danish vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Danes

Iroquois

Excellent
Fair
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Danish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,188,112 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 123.2 Iroquois.
Danish Integration in Iroquois Communities

Danish vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $87,255, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($87,676 compared to $74,279, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $36,408, a difference of 3.6%), median earnings ($46,392 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $47,380, a difference of 11.9%).
Danish vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricDanishIroquois
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,095
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,900
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,676
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Average
$46,392
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,246
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,730
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,041
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,221
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,619
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,117
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
25.1%

Danish vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 49.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 49.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.4%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 15.8%).
Danish vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricDanishIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
13.5%

Danish vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.6%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Danish vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDanishIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Danish vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Danish vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDanishIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.7%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Danish vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 33.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple households (51.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.52%), family households (66.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.3%).
Danish vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDanishIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.1%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
38.2%

Danish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 66.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.2%).
Danish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDanishIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.7%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
6.5%

Danish vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Danish vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricDanishIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.1%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Danish vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Danish vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricDanishIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%