Choctaw vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,682,137 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 26.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.3%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $30,644, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,503, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $35,326, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $50,539, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $38,285, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 90.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.0%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 121.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.9%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 79.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.8%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%).