Immigrants from France vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from France
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from France

Pima

Excellent
Poor
8,515
SOCIAL INDEX
82.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
69th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from France Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,125,892 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.941. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 227.3 Pima.
Immigrants from France Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from France vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $30,644, a difference of 78.0%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $77,431, a difference of 55.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,680 compared to $73,365, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $35,326, a difference of 26.1%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 29.7%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,557
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,076
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,743
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,490
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,715
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,541
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,805
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,257
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$113,680
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,826
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 142.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 124.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 101.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 38.9%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 162.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 106.0%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (61.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
Family Households
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 119.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 117.1%), and professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 105.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.8%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from France vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from France vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from FrancePima
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%