Choctaw vs Taiwanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Taiwanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Taiwanese
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Taiwanese Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,016,409 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.319% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 319.3 Taiwanese.
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $101,492, a difference of 29.8%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,455, a difference of 29.0%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $89,900, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $49,804, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $55,556, a difference of 16.4%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $46,455 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $107,295 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $89,900 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Excellent $47,902 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Good $55,556 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Excellent $40,576 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Tragic $49,804 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $101,492 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Excellent $104,180 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Excellent $62,894 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 62.1%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 55.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.2%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 61.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Good 66.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Choctaw vs Taiwanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 66.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Taiwanese |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.4% |