Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,153,579 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.828. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 161.6 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $43,997, a difference of 22.2%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $82,560, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $96,086, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $56,975, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $52,860, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $45,682, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.2%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.46%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%).