Choctaw vs Romanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Romanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Romanians
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Romanian Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,369,245 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Romanians.
Choctaw vs Romanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $48,445, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $108,609, a difference of 32.0%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $91,994, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,632, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,142, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $48,445 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $111,243 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $91,994 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $50,244 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $60,063 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $41,663 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $53,632 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $102,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $108,609 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $64,142 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 28.0% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.3%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Good 83.0% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 90.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 62.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 41.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Choctaw vs Romanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.3%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Romanian |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.4% |