Japanese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,741,885 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 16.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $73,365, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($83,395 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.8%), and per capita income ($39,870 compared to $30,644, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 105.3%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 85.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 132.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.7%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 46.4%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.2%), bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and associate's degree (41.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 50.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.7%).