Choctaw vs European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Europeans

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

European Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,834,897 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Europeans.
Choctaw Integration in European Communities

Choctaw vs European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $106,367, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $108,099, a difference of 27.4%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $45,836, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $39,457, a difference of 16.8%).
Choctaw vs European Income
Income MetricChoctawEuropean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$45,836
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$108,099
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$88,751
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Excellent
$47,915
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$57,637
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Fair
$39,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$98,310
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$106,367
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$63,779
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
29.4%

Choctaw vs European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.0%).
Choctaw vs European Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawEuropean
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Poor
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.5%

Choctaw vs European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Choctaw vs European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawEuropean
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Choctaw vs European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawEuropean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Fair
82.6%

Choctaw vs European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.4%).
Choctaw vs European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawEuropean
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Choctaw vs European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Choctaw vs European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawEuropean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Choctaw vs European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Choctaw vs European Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawEuropean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Choctaw vs European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and European communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.9%).
Choctaw vs European Disability
Disability MetricChoctawEuropean
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%