Arapaho vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Pima
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,204,615 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Pima.
Arapaho vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $50,539, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,503, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $42,357, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $73,365, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($36,586 compared to $38,285, a difference of 4.6%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Arapaho vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 87.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.7%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Arapaho vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.6%), male unemployment (11.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Arapaho vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 72.8% |
Arapaho vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.9%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.75, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Arapaho vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 92.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Arapaho vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.5%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Arapaho vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |