Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Pima
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,260,353 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 98.3 Pima.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $30,644, a difference of 66.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $73,365, a difference of 51.9%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $77,431, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $35,326, a difference of 22.0%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 26.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 152.9%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 133.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 39.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 115.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 116.0%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 76.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (62.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 106.0%), bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 94.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 78.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |