Choctaw vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,157,521 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.543. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 60.0 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $53,154, a difference of 47.6%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $120,487, a difference of 42.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $116,328, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,389, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $67,626, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 56.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 96.1%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 77.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.6%).