Choctaw vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,291,952 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 81.0 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $99,904, a difference of 21.4%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $102,676, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $94,610, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $59,535, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,173, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.3%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%).