Immigrants from Jordan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,923,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 62.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $30,644, a difference of 47.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $73,365, a difference of 44.7%), and median household income ($89,412 compared to $63,262, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.26%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $35,326, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $82,821, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 123.0%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 115.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 166.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.3%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.4%), bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 73.5%), and associate's degree (48.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%).