Nonimmigrants vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,367,610 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 8.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $30,644, a difference of 32.7%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $73,365, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $35,326, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 114.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 95.4%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 87.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 20.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 141.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 106.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.8%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 78.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (13.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and associate's degree (42.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.3%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).