Canadian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,508,545 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.630% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 630.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $30,644, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $73,365, a difference of 42.5%), and median household income ($87,769 compared to $63,262, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $35,326, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $82,821, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 151.0%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 124.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 44.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 122.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 83.2%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 61.2%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 69.6%), bachelor's degree (38.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 67.4%), and associate's degree (47.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.9%).