Iranian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,253,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Iranian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iranians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iranians corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,786 compared to $30,644, a difference of 91.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,350 compared to $73,365, a difference of 76.3%), and median household income ($109,835 compared to $63,262, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,548 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($47,421 compared to $35,326, a difference of 34.2%), and wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 169.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 157.9%), and receiving food stamps (7.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 139.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and single mother poverty (25.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 163.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 135.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 123.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 117.2%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 103.5%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.75, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 65.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (22.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 140.7%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 138.7%), and professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 130.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iranian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 93.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 86.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 86.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 21.6%).