Samoan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,827,331 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.725. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 25.520% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 25,520.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $73,365, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($86,498 compared to $63,262, a difference of 36.7%), and per capita income ($39,826 compared to $30,644, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $35,326, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,385 compared to $82,821, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 133.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 114.7%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 47.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 134.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 125.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 57.8%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 37.1%), associate's degree (41.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.1%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%).