Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cambodia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cambodia

Pima

Fair
Poor
2,971
SOCIAL INDEX
27.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
236th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Cambodia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,102,876 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 34.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Cambodia Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $30,644, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $73,365, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.9%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,434
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,222
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,304
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,090
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,594
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,833
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,450
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,533
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,537
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,580
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 102.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 85.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.6%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 138.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 133.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.7%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.7%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.2%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.33
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.8%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 65.2%), bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 47.3%), and associate's degree (42.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 11th grade (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 9th grade (92.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaPima
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%