Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,738,087 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $30,644, a difference of 51.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $73,365, a difference of 43.7%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $63,262, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $35,326, a difference of 19.1%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 118.9%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 108.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 44.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 159.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 117.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 115.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 95.0%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 84.6%), bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 80.7%), and associate's degree (49.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.9%).