Choctaw vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,302,667 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 69.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 37.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $44,822, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $72,093, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $77,044, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $44,356, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $38,949, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 38.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.7%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 26.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 58.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 50.9%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.97%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and male disability (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.4%).