Choctaw vs Northern European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Northern European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Northern Europeans

Fair
Excellent
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Northern European Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,821,244 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Northern Europeans.
Choctaw Integration in Northern European Communities

Choctaw vs Northern European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $47,698, a difference of 32.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $107,870, a difference of 31.1%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $110,635, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.52%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,678, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $40,491, a difference of 19.9%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Income
Income MetricChoctawNorthern European
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$47,698
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$110,635
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$90,446
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$48,887
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$58,588
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Excellent
$40,491
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Fair
$51,678
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$100,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$107,870
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$64,658
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.3%

Choctaw vs Northern European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawNorthern European
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.8%

Choctaw vs Northern European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawNorthern European
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Choctaw vs Northern European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawNorthern European
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Average
82.7%

Choctaw vs Northern European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawNorthern European
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.6%

Choctaw vs Northern European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawNorthern European
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%

Choctaw vs Northern European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 61.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawNorthern European
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
69.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
41.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Choctaw vs Northern European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.7%).
Choctaw vs Northern European Disability
Disability MetricChoctawNorthern European
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%