Finnish vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,526,539 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $30,644, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.2%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.63%), median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 174.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 137.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 120.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 161.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 136.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 105.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.8%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 62.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 84.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 58.0%), associate's degree (46.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).