Choctaw vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,195,023 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 51.2 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $44,318, a difference of 23.1%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $84,691, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $98,660, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $59,090, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $53,680, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.4%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 60.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.4%).