Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Pima

Good
Poor
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,495,037 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.189% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 1,189.0 Pima.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $30,644, a difference of 70.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $73,365, a difference of 52.2%), and median household income ($94,846 compared to $63,262, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $35,326, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $82,821, a difference of 28.7%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 148.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 127.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 98.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.6%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 119.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 119.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.3%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 105.9%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.5%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 103.5%), bachelor's degree (44.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 91.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayPima
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%