Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Pima

Fair
Poor
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,371,796 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Pima.
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $30,644, a difference of 53.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $73,365, a difference of 37.0%), and median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $42,357, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $50,539, a difference of 11.5%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,929
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Average
$103,197
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Good
$86,425
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,151
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,941
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,363
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,846
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,849
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,523
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,331
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 95.7%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 83.2%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.8%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 142.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 134.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 114.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.7%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 130.1%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 99.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.75, a difference of 15.7%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 116.9%), no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 88.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 83.9%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.4%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 93.1%), bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 84.3%), and associate's degree (50.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 13.5%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%