Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nigeria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nigeria

Pima

Fair
Poor
2,310
SOCIAL INDEX
20.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
263rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Nigeria Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,975,551 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Pima.
Immigrants from Nigeria Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $30,644, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,804 compared to $73,365, a difference of 29.2%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $63,262, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.7%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,339
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,439
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,236
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,030
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,310
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,294
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,174
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,589
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,804
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$58,942
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 106.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 83.3%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.6%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 41.6%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
Poverty
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 132.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 92.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.9%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.9%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.8%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.7%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 58.2%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.6%), and associate's degree (44.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.4%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NigeriaPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%