Bhutanese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,413,536 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $30,644, a difference of 62.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $73,365, a difference of 60.5%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $63,262, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,326, a difference of 23.6%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 178.5%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 160.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 136.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 56.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 169.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 134.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.6%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 84.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 85.9%), bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 83.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.7%).