Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Pima
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,531,505 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 62.3 Pima.
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,123 compared to $30,644, a difference of 34.2%), wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and median household income ($76,517 compared to $63,262, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $50,539, a difference of 0.41%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,123 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $89,249 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,517 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,596 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,279 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,932 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,538 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,311 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,552 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,747 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 56.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 25.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 89.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 34.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 67.2% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 108.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.75, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.1% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 187.5%), no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 165.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 142.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 37.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 81.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 142.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.9%), bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and associate's degree (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.53%), 9th grade (93.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.1% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.0% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Pima |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.94% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 47.9% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |