Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hispanic or Latino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Hispanics or Latinos

Fair
Tragic
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hispanic or Latino Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,456,349 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.118% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 118.3 Hispanics or Latinos.
Choctaw Integration in Hispanic or Latino Communities

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,279, a difference of 10.6%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $73,823, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,270 compared to $40,288, a difference of 0.040%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,832, a difference of 0.43%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $35,688, a difference of 0.87%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Income
Income MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$35,688
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$85,647
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$73,823
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$40,288
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$46,419
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$34,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,279
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$80,515
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$86,006
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$52,832
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Excellent
24.9%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
20.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
24.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.8%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
80.1%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
44.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
37.8%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 67.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and high school diploma (87.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.15%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.92%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
92.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
90.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
88.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
87.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
85.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
82.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
79.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
51.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
37.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
29.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%).
Choctaw vs Hispanic or Latino Disability
Disability MetricChoctawHispanic or Latino
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%