Apache vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,456,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 12.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($34,886 compared to $30,644, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($70,927 compared to $63,262, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,260 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (24.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 64.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.4%), births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 21.8%), associate's degree (36.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.88%), disability (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.3%).