Choctaw vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Macedonians

Fair
Excellent
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,557,218 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Macedonians.
Choctaw Integration in Macedonian Communities

Choctaw vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $47,573, a difference of 32.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $101,882, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $107,074, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,564, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,563, a difference of 20.1%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricChoctawMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.6%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.2%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.4%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawMacedonian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.5%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawMacedonian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
27.9%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 54.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.8%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.5%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 51.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Choctaw vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.9%).
Choctaw vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawMacedonian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%