Choctaw vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,899,088 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.932. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.889% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 888.9 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $33,279, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $44,775, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $33,806, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,081, a difference of 1.9%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $67,879, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.1%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.58%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.9%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.6%).