Choctaw vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Brazilians

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,259,816 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Brazilians.
Choctaw Integration in Brazilian Communities

Choctaw vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,700, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $88,934, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $104,408, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,465, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,837, a difference of 19.1%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricChoctawBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
26.7%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.8%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawBrazilian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.1%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.83%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawBrazilian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.7%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.42%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.98%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.4%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.6%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.4%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Choctaw vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Choctaw vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawBrazilian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%