Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,766,285 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 97.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $30,644, a difference of 68.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $73,365, a difference of 52.5%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $63,262, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $35,326, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $82,821, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 148.9%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 139.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 160.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 122.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 105.3%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 81.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 100.5%), bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 89.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 83.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.7%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.7%).