Choctaw vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,991,028 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 77.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.8%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $29,031, a difference of 24.0%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $70,989, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $33,046, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $42,380, a difference of 7.2%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $36,999, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 88.3%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and male poverty (14.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.4%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 76.0%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 75.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.65, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.6%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.8%).