Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,814,905 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.464% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 464.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $51,503, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $30,644, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $50,539, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $38,285, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 85.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 147.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.2%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.75, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.77%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 44.7%), associate's degree (41.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 48.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.9%).