Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,621,519 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.865% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 1,864.9 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,929, a difference of 30.4%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $43,363, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $98,849, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $56,331, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,846, a difference of 20.7%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $57,941, a difference of 21.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$46,929
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Average
$103,197
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Good
$86,425
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$50,151
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$57,941
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$43,363
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,846
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$98,849
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Average
$100,523
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$56,331
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.7%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Fair
17.1%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 30.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
29.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
82.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.5%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
25.8%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 238.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 114.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 91.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 91.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
26.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
73.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
37.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
12.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
3.6%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 61.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
50.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
42.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
2.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 120.5%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 68.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%