U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

U.S. Virgin Islander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

U.S. Virgin Islanders

Pima

Tragic
Poor
556
SOCIAL INDEX
3.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
343rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in U.S. Virgin Islander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,022,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.597% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to a decrease of 597.2 Pima.
U.S. Virgin Islander Integration in Pima Communities

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,589 compared to $30,644, a difference of 22.7%), median household income ($71,853 compared to $63,262, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $73,365, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $50,539, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.1%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Income
Income MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,589
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,294
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,853
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,448
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,066
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,424
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,448
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,911
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,736
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,072
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.1%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 71.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.7%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.3%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
19.0%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 110.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 94.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.2%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
11.7%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
72.8%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.1%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.75, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.17%), single mother households (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.8%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
51.5%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.5%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
7.9%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 43.2%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.4%), and associate's degree (42.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.59%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 49.3%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricU.S. Virgin IslanderPima
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%