Choctaw vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Scandinavians

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,719,789 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 35.4 Scandinavians.
Choctaw Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $102,969, a difference of 25.1%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $104,410, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $86,073, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,306, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $46,433, a difference of 15.3%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricChoctawScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
29.1%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.6%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawScandinavian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawScandinavian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Good
83.0%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.4%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawScandinavian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
29.8%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.94%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Average
1.8%

Choctaw vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
Choctaw vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawScandinavian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%