Tsimshian vs Iroquois Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Iroquois
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Tsimshian
Iroquois
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,447,446 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 27.3% |
| Range | 10.9% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Iroquois by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Spaniard (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Ugandans | 31.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cherokee | 30.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Portuguese | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Arabs | 27.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.3% |
| Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |