Sri Lankan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chinese
11.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,848,578 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 57.9% |
Range | 63.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 12.4% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Singapore (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (11.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |