Malaysian vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,783,345 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Romanians.
Malaysian Integration in Romanian Communities

Malaysian vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $48,445, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $60,063, a difference of 18.3%), and median family income ($95,230 compared to $111,243, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $53,632, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $64,142, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.6%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Income
Income MetricMalaysianRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Malaysian vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Malaysian vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianRomanian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Malaysian vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Good
83.0%

Malaysian vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Malaysian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.2%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.2%

Malaysian vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.7%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Malaysian vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Malaysian vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianRomanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.4%