Malaysian vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,300,058 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 127.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $53,232, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $86,764, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,930, a difference of 3.8%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,699, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $41,474, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 55.1%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 45.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.7%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.0%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 7.0%), college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.0%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%).